250 b4 b5 or mongrel ??? DNA TEST PLEASE
-
Hal
- Expert
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:33 am
- Location: Surrey
Perhaps the shop dressed it up with a current paint set to shift some older stock? After all, they were starting to sit around in showrooms in the later part of the model life. Actually, they sat around showrooms at the start too (the '72's), but that was down more to their extraordinarily high price.
- Wolfie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10593
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Back to West Yorks, but only just..
- Contact:
-
the180kid
- Expert
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:52 pm
- Contact:
-
Hal
- Expert
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:33 am
- Location: Surrey
So many unknowns - they may have had a B4 insurance repair in at the time. Spare parts were cripplingly expensive in the day, so they could have been profitably sold on.GH Knowles wrote:would seem to be the obvious but new seat ,tank, tail and fender doesnt seem very cost effective for a bike that they couldnt shift in general at the time,could have been heavily subsidised by kawasaki uk.
-
the180kid
- Expert
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:52 pm
- Contact:
on reflection the b4s paint scheme is not that brilliant is it,GH Knowles wrote:would seem to be the obvious but new seat ,tank, tail and fender doesnt seem very cost effective for a bike that they couldnt shift in general at the time,could have been heavily subsidised by kawasaki uk..anyway its coming on nicely my B4,and a half..
wonder if theres anymore hanging around out there they cant shift???
did it make anyone back in the day actually want one ?,
but the b5 colour scheme is much more striking,
are you sure the bike is original paint, have you got a picture so we can scrutinise it, perhaps the person you got the bike off put that set on it because they liked it better?,

