Who owned that?
-
Barrie
- Expert
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:52 pm
- Location: Queenborough Kent U.K.
Re: Who owned that?
ok thank for the clarification,
or the data base is only as good as the operator
or the data base is only as good as the operator
-
Hal
- Expert
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:33 am
- Location: Surrey
Re: Who owned that?
A little bit harshBarrie wrote: or the data base is only as good as the operator
-
Neil the Don
- Expert
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:52 pm
- Location: West Yorkshire
Re: Who owned that?
That`s what I thought !! And it`s wrong. Database is as good as the information available/provided.Hal wrote:A little bit harshBarrie wrote: or the data base is only as good as the operator
Nothing to do with the operator.
While I certainly would have ribbed Rick over the years for his trainspotting tendancies. He started collecting this info when were riding out of date , out of fashion old bikes. It`s an awful lot of work , which he has stuck at , as it was his hobby. Bit of a stamp collecter Ol Rick.
Now, however, by good fortune , it`s become a very useful tool ,and valuable addtion to the knowledge and history of the models and Marque.. We could never have foreseen the boom in the Classic Vintage Jap bike scene. Or the muppetery of the DVLa , which has resulted in Rick`s hobby turning into a really useful help in keeping/getting more nad more of these bikes on the road. HURRAH !!!
- El Presidente
- Expert
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Nottingham / Inverness (Fl) / Traverse City (Mi)
Re: Who owned that?
Hal wrote: The registration is YND - RB may know if that is one of those handed out for imports maybe?
.
Yep, "YND" (especially around the 400's) was generally issued toImports
Keep One wheel down . . . . .
-
Hal
- Expert
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:33 am
- Location: Surrey
Re: Who owned that?
The database was started so very long ago that it predates Microsoft Office and is not as easily interogated as you'd imagine if you are thinking in terms of the contemporay software you are familiar with.
Its not in the 400's Rick - YND167L
Its not in the 400's Rick - YND167L
-
Neil the Don
- Expert
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:52 pm
- Location: West Yorkshire
Re: Who owned that?
Integrated Hal. I think you meant , integrated !!Hal wrote:The database was started so very long ago that it predates Microsoft Office and is not as easily interogated as you'd imagine if you are thinking in terms of the contemporay software you are familiar with.
Its not in the 400's Rick - YND167L
I had a YDS7 Yam with a YND xx L number plate. Was back in the day when the Local DVLA`s handed out numbers. I think they used up old unallocated reg numbers , from a centrally held list ?
- Mitsui Spy
- Expert
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:39 am
- Location: Wakefield, West Yorks
Re: Who owned that?
No, I'm quite sure Hal did mean interrogated.Neil the Don wrote:Integrated Hal. I think you meant , integrated !!Hal wrote:The database was started so very long ago that it predates Microsoft Office and is not as easily interogated as you'd imagine if you are thinking in terms of the contemporay software you are familiar with.
- Peter Mac
- Expert
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:58 pm
- Location: chichester, west sussex
Re: Who owned that?
Rob h1f now owns a uk h1d with shx reg no now ! It used to be mineOddnedod wrote:One of my mates owned a British 1973 H1D registration number SHX 45L,but it never showed up
on RB's database? Also my old KH500 registration number LYU 685P also doesn't show up either?
-
Hal
- Expert
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:33 am
- Location: Surrey
Re: Who owned that?
At least there is one other bright person here, sheesh - I absolutely did mean interogated of course.Mitsui Spy wrote:No, I'm quite sure Hal did mean interrogated.Neil the Don wrote:Integrated Hal. I think you meant , integrated !!Hal wrote:The database was started so very long ago that it predates Microsoft Office and is not as easily interogated as you'd imagine if you are thinking in terms of the contemporay software you are familiar with.
Neil, what are you on, you know I try to select the appropriate words - even if I occasionally mis-spell.
- Triple Parts
- Expert
- Posts: 6492
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 11:00 am
- Location: Lancashire Riviera
- Contact:
Re: Who owned that?
I don't understand Neil? Why are you stating the obvious, what am I missing?Neil the Don wrote:Yes Tony , there seems to be a few non standard parts on it"................
FREE Triples downloads here... https://kawatriple.net/
Triples Parts here...https://kawasakitripleparts.com/
Triples Parts here...https://kawasakitripleparts.com/
-
Oddnedod
- Expert
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:36 pm
- Location: Shropshire
Re: Who owned that?
Peter Mac I just looked it up on the vehicle enquiry service-gov website,
on the H1D -SHX 45L and it says its not been taxed since the end of
May 1980.So it wont be that H1D
on the H1D -SHX 45L and it says its not been taxed since the end of
May 1980.So it wont be that H1D
-
Neil the Don
- Expert
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:52 pm
- Location: West Yorkshire
Re: Who owned that?
Ah. I see. Apologies Hal. some sort of computer babble thing. I still crave machines with valves . ( no not 4 strokes)Mitsui Spy wrote:No, I'm quite sure Hal did mean interrogated.Neil the Don wrote:Integrated Hal. I think you meant , integrated !!Hal wrote:The database was started so very long ago that it predates Microsoft Office and is not as easily interogated as you'd imagine if you are thinking in terms of the contemporay software you are familiar with.
-
Neil the Don
- Expert
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:52 pm
- Location: West Yorkshire
Re: Who owned that?
Ach Tony !! Whatever seems obvious to me , often appears pretty obtuse to some others.Tony_d123 wrote:I don't understand Neil? Why are you stating the obvious, what am I missing?Neil the Don wrote:Yes Tony , there seems to be a few non standard parts on it"................
It was in the context of the discussion, there is a hugely modified bike and you were talking about it mixing up parts like a standard bike . As if it was a critique of a standard restoration . "well, that bit is from a year later. The D had a different seat catch " That sort of thing.
Thing about wit. It doesn't seem so numerous when it needs to be explained. At least in type , you can't say you don't understand my accent !!! Y'ken min ???
- Triple Parts
- Expert
- Posts: 6492
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 11:00 am
- Location: Lancashire Riviera
- Contact:
Re: Who owned that?
Ah I see. It doesn't matter about the mix of parts, I actually said it looks quite good if it was the right money. The point I was making was some things don't quite add up and as with any special it would need a careful looking at. Caveat emptor 
FREE Triples downloads here... https://kawatriple.net/
Triples Parts here...https://kawasakitripleparts.com/
Triples Parts here...https://kawasakitripleparts.com/
-
StephenK
- Inter
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:43 pm
- Location: dagenham essex
Re: Who owned that?
just have a look at the specials on this site an other to get an idea I've got a zxr400 front an rear on mineWyn wrote:Is there a single thread on how to modify your triple, would be good to know what fits what in the way of non standard parts from modern bikes
Engine, suspension n brake upgrade/ swaps, that sort of thing
Must be loads of goodies out there .....