Interesting . . . . (Road Tax)

Any triple related issues, topics or stories then POST THEM HERE.......
Post Reply
User avatar
El Presidente
Expert
Posts: 2353
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 8:05 pm
Location: Nottingham / Inverness (Fl) / Traverse City (Mi)

Interesting . . . . (Road Tax)

Post by El Presidente »

A freedom of information request made by the Financial Times shows that vehicle excise duty takings, following the abolition of the paper based tax disc in October 2014, fell by a huge amount.


The Department for Transport previously estimated that £80m of vehicle tax revenue would be lost in 2015 to evasion - they generate this figure by performing a roadside survey every two years to identify untaxed vehicles. We'll have to wait until June 2017 for the next one to be carried out to see if tax evasion has really soared.

The aim of moving to a digital system and scraping the tax disc was to reduce administration costs for the DVLA, but in the 12 months following the move (October 2014 to September 2015) they took £5.71 billion - some £412 million lower than the previous twelve months.

The DVLA replied with a statement saying that the drop in revenues was due to a new phased payment plan that was not previously available, meaning that drivers had to pay their tax in one lump sum, but from November 2014 had the option to spread this over a 12 month period with direct debit. This accounting for the difference in monthly cash receipts year-on-year.

When the disc was withdrawn, the motoring service RAC warned of a risk of increased evasion - the absence of a visible disc encouraging more users to try to get away without paying. After these figures came to light David Bizley, chief engineer at the RAC, said the abolition of the paper tax disc made sense from an efficiency perspective and that there was no reason to believe that the forecast savings were not being achieved. But he added: "The recent figure of a £400m year-on-year reduction in VED revenues is worrying. Undoubtedly, part of this is due to the rephrasing of revenues arising from allowing those paying VED to do so with monthly direct debits, and the increased take-up of low-carbon vehicles, which attract lower rates of VED."

The Department for Transport previously estimated that £80m of vehicle tax revenue would be lost in 2015 to evasion - they generate this figure by performing a roadside survey every two years to identify untaxed vehicles. We'll have to wait until June 2017 for the next one to be carried out to see if tax evasion has really soared.
Keep One wheel down . . . . .
User avatar
gotz
Expert
Posts: 1234
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: High Wycombe

Re: Interesting . . . . (Road Tax)

Post by gotz »

But that is perfectly OK with the DVLA as the VED for vehicles registered after 1 April 2017 will almost double :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
Nobody really cares if you're miserable, so you might as well be happy.
Neil the Don
Expert
Posts: 2804
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Interesting . . . . (Road Tax)

Post by Neil the Don »

I'd like to knowjusthow much an increase in retained tax the bastards have won through only refunding full months tax , when you sell a vehicle. They get a double benefit if you sell. , as you lose a whole months refund even if it is 1st of month. While they also get another month of new owner as their road tax is back dated , even if sale/ transfer happens on last day of month.

Never mind their stupid fines if you fail to sorn the fucker !!!
Post Reply