As some of you may know I am a designer with a graphics background but for the last thirty years been a product/brand designer so I see everything from an aesthetic point of view. Ugliness and bad proportions offend me in a way that to others may seem a little bit neurotic - but that is the way it is for me, and most other people who work in design.
Anyway. This is my problem. Why does the H2B and the H1E (I think it's this one) not have the coloured graphic stripe continuing onto the tail piece? WHAT WERE KAWASAKI THINKING? Were they trying to save money? Were they just lazy that year? Did someone think it was a good idea? Obviously someone put them right because by the next year they'd reshaped the front stripe to be more in keeping with the new tank shape and added the stripe onto the tail.
At any shows, or in model line-ups they stand out amongst all the other years as looking completely unfinished and thoughtless.
I'd often looked at H2Bs when I was searching to find a bike to buy but I could never overcome my dislike of this so always knew I'd end up with a C. (Told you I was neurotic!)
Is there a good story behind this historical aesthetic cock-up?
While I'm at it. Why do some of the H1s of the same period not have grab rails? They look doubly unfinished too.